A Planning Workflow Built in Under 24 Hours at Project Convergence Capstone 6

Published on
Legion’s AI summary

Requirements keep arriving after deployment. Software has to be able to change after deployment too.

  • The gap: Requirements gathering captures the work users know to ask for. Repetitive work, manual reconstruction, and friction nobody thinks to call a requirement stay invisible until software meets the mission.
  • The delivery model: At PCC6 that meant identifying a need during operations and turning it into working software while the exercise was still underway. The wider implication is that users can keep shaping software after deployment as new needs emerge.
  • Field evidence: At Project Convergence Capstone 6 in July 2026, Legion Intelligence engineers embedded with a Future Operations planning cell identified a need for planning discussion capture and synthesis and built a working App on tactical SIPRNet in under 24 hours. That figure measures responsiveness to an operationally discovered need, not an operational outcome for the unit. Legion CEO Ben Van Roo's field observations from the same event, The Denied Column, cover the compute and echelon side.

During planning sessions at Project Convergence Capstone 6 (PCC6), planners captured tasks, open questions, and key assertions by hand so they could carry forward into the next round of planning.

Legion engineers embedded with the cell saw an opportunity. Nobody had written that work into a software requirement, because to the planners it was simply part of the job.

Why do some operational workflows stay invisible until deployment?

Some operational work stays invisible until deployment because requirements gathering captures what users know how to describe: the products they own, the processes with names, the steps written into a standard operating procedure.

What it can miss is the work nobody thinks of as a discrete task: reconstructing a planning conversation, tracking assumptions made against operational facts, carrying an open question into the next session. It is time-consuming and repeated, and to the person doing it, simply part of the job.

Some requirements only become visible when you watch the work being done.

What did planners at Project Convergence Capstone 6 need?

Planners at PCC6 needed more of the planning conversation to survive the session. Legion embedded alongside the Future Operations (FUOPS) planning cell of 4th Battalion, 10th Special Forces Group. PCC6 was a division-scale U.S. Army modernization event at the National Training Center focused on validating Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2).

Like most planning, much of the work happened through conversation. Decisions, assumptions, risks, and tasks emerged in working groups and huddles before they made their way into an order. That context was spread across notes, documents, chat, and individual memory.

Planners were manually capturing tasks, open questions, and key assertions so they could feed forward into Courses of Action (COAs). The opportunity was straightforward: capture and preserve more of that context without requiring planners to reconstruct it by hand.

How did Legion build a planning capture App in under 24 hours?

Legion built the planning capture App in under 24 hours because the need surfaced during the exercise itself, with engineers working alongside the planning cell.

The Planning Discussion Capture and Synthesis App was designed to capture planning discussions for later review and identify tasks, open questions, and key assertions for follow-on planning, reducing the reconstruction that would otherwise fall to manual notes and individual memory. It ran on tactical SIPRNet, delivered over the cell's tactical local area network (TACLAN).

Legion could move quickly because the App was built inside the Space the cell was already using. It inherited the deployment's existing data connections, permissions, and approval gates. There was no new environment to stand up or new version of the software to field. Nothing about the deployment changed except what it could do.

Read the PCC6 field report for the full account of the deployment, the workflow, and the environment it ran in.

How does building during operations change software delivery?

Building during operations changes when a requirement can still be answered. PCC6 reinforced a simple point: requirements don't stop arriving once software is deployed. Some only become visible when users are doing the work.

In a traditional software model, a need discovered during an exercise enters a backlog and competes with every other requirement for a future release. By the time the capability reaches the user, the exercise that surfaced it may be long over.

Legion Packs, the role-based capability bundles Legion ships, carry this kind of work as governed, auditable capability, so an App built overnight arrives with the same permissions, attribution, and audit as everything else in the deployment.

At PCC6, the measured result was delivery speed: less than 24 hours from identifying an operational need to a working capability on tactical SIPRNet. The exercise did not measure changes in planner time or planning quality, so we don't claim either.

The useful standard is adaptability: deployed software that can absorb a requirement it was never built for.

Who builds the next one

Legion engineers built this one because they were embedded with the planning cell when the need surfaced. The Legion software underneath made it possible to turn that need into a working capability in less than 24 hours.

Building every new App with Legion engineers does not scale. The model that does is customers building and adapting capabilities themselves. That matters because many of the workflows a staff will need won't be identified in advance. They'll emerge as users encounter new problems and find better ways to do the work.

Legion engineers built this one. The customer builder builds the next one.

The Operations Officer Pack carries this same principle forward: helping staff preserve context across shifts, understand what changed, and act on what matters next. See the Operations Officer Pack.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from a custom build?
A custom build starts from scratch, and the resulting system has to be sustained, accredited, and integrated on its own. The PCC6 App was created inside Legion software that was already deployed rather than as a separate standalone system, so it inherited an environment that was already running.
What was actually measured at PCC6?
Elapsed time from an operational need surfacing in conversation to a working capability running on tactical SIPRNet: under 24 hours. Legion has not published time savings, efficiency gains, or planning-quality improvements for this deployment, because none were measured. Legion also makes no claim either way about what happened to the App after the exercise ended.
How is human approval preserved when a capability like this produces work?
Every step in a Legion Pack runs under human direction or approval, based on the policy you set. Full attribution shows who did what, when, and on whose behalf, including for agent actions. Audit logs are built in.
What is NGC2, and how does Legion relate to it?
Next Generation Command and Control is the U.S. Army's redesign of command and control, spanning C2 applications, data and AI, infrastructure, and transport, aimed at delivering the right data to commanders quickly including under degraded conditions. PCC6 was its division-scale validation event, running roughly 10,000 participants across the Joint force, multinational partners, and industry against more than 90 technologies, concepts, and formations.
Can our own people build these Apps?
Today, Legion engineers build them alongside the customer, which is what happened at PCC6. The direction is customer builders creating and adapting Apps themselves as new needs emerge.
Are these official Project Convergence findings?
No. This describes Legion's own engineering work during the event. It is not an official assessment of Project Convergence Capstone 6, of NGC2, or of any unit's performance.

Table of Contents

At Project Convergence Capstone 6, Legion Intelligence engineers turned a planning need into a working workflow on tactical SIPR in under 24 hours.